BusinessWeek’s Top 25 “Best Affordable” Suburbs

A recent article in BusinessWeek discusses the “best affordable” suburbs among the largest U.S. metro areas.  

BusinessWeek put their list together with the help of Sperling’s Best Places.  Their methodology for reconciling “best” with “affordable” seems equal parts art and science, balancing “affordability” (median home prices relative to the metro region and cost of living index relative to the national average) with other factors such as “academics” (student test scores in public schools relative to state average),  “safety” (violent crime index relative to national average) and indicators of “culture” (special sauce). 

Here in the Boston area, the winner was Sharon, Massachusetts, which also appears to have the distinction on this Top 25 list as having the second lowest violent crime index on the list (19, versus 17 in Elkhorn, Nebraska… highest was 282(!) in Sugarland, Texas… and they say guns don’t kill people). Boston’s Sharon also had the second highest cost of living index on the list (165.6, versus 172.1 in West Nyack, New York… lowest was Coralville, Iowa at 96.9… considering the national average is indexed at 100, none of these are “cheap” places, relatively speaking).   The article also singled out Sharon, Massachusetts for its natural resources and religious/cultural diversity. 

As for the Sperling website, I found it pretty opaque when it came to their stats.  However, they do seem to have a decent bizdev/ infotainment private labelling program for their demographic data. 

Here’s the Top 25 list:

Metro Region City/Town
Albuquerque Sandia Heights, N.M. 87122
Atlanta Roswell, Ga. 30075
Baltimore Columbia, Md. 21045
Boston Sharon, Ma. 02067
Charlotte Matthews, N.C. 28105
Chicago Lake Zurich, Ill. 60047
Cincinnati Evendale, Ohio 45241
Dallas Flower Mound/Lewisville, Tex. 75028
Denver Castle Rock, Colo. 80104
Fort Lauderdale Weston, Fla. 33326
Houston Sugarland, Tex. 77479
Indianapolis Noblesville, Ind. 46060
Iowa City Coralville, Iowa 52241
Kansas City Shawnee, Kan. 66216
Los Angeles Santa Clarita, Calif. 91354
Minneapolis-St. Paul Lakeville, Minn. 55044
Newark Livingston, N.J. 07039
New York West Nyack, N.Y. 10994
Omaha Elkhorn, Neb. 68022
Philadelphia West Chester, Pa. 19382
Sacramento Folsom, Calif. 95630
Salt Lake City Kaysville, Utah 84037
Seattle Mukilteo, Wash. 98275
St. Louis Saint Charles, Mo. 63304
Washington Herndon, Va. 20170

Looking at this list, though, I see that there are a few “largest U.S. metro areas” left out.  For example, Detroit and San Francisco are the tenth and eleventh largest metro areas, respectively, yet don’t appear on the radar here. Do you suppose there was nothing “good” or “affordable” (again, respectively) to be found in those places?  A tempting theory, but it probably has more to do about getting a more diverse and entertaining range of places on this list, eg, include Omaha (metro pop. 754,722) but not include Pittsburgh (metro pop. 2,370,776). 

So I guess the significance of this list is pretty low. In terms of infotainment however, it’s pretty good… but I do scratch my head on the choice of Newark and Sacramento… I mean, yeah, they’re big, but not as big as Phoenix and San Diego. Maybe this was one of those “cultural” calls? 



Predated Entry (Icon)


World Gazetteer – America: metropolitan areas


About danspira

My blog is at: My face in real life appears at a higher resolution, although I do feel pixelated sometimes.

Posted on November 20, 2006, in Analytics, Cartography. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply -- for humans only, no spambots

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: